This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The role of national registries in improving patient safety for hip and knee replacements
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 8 November 2016
Accepted: 4 October 2017
Published: 16 October 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Nov 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|13 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Max Gordon|
|5 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Brian R. Hallstrom|
|14 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Anne Lubbeke|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Anne Lubbeke|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Oct 2017||Editorially accepted|
|16 Oct 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12891-017-1773-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.