Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A qualitative study of patient education needs for hip and knee replacement

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Dec 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel Howard Wiznia
8 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marie Westby
6 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Deborah Kennedy
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel Howard Wiznia
29 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marie Westby
1 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Deborah Kennedy
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marie Westby
7 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Deborah Kennedy
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
3 Oct 2017 Editorially accepted
12 Oct 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12891-017-1769-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement