Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Locking compression plate distal ulna hook plate fixation versus intramedullary screw fixation for displaced avulsion fifth Metatarsal Base fractures: a comparative retrospective cohort study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Jun 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ali Al Kaissi
8 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Albright
10 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Johannes Beckmann
12 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Lin Xie
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Lin Xie
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Lin Xie
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
30 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Lin Xie
Resubmission - Version 5
30 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
21 Sep 2017 Editorially accepted
26 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12891-017-1766-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement