Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Improved clinical outcome measures of knee pain and function with concurrent resolution of subchondral Bone Marrow Edema Lesion and joint effusion in an osteoarthritic patient following Pentosan Polysulphate Sodium treatment: a case report

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Apr 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
14 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Simona Gurzu
8 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Johannes Fakler
19 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Matthew Sampson
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Matthew Sampson
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Matthew Sampson
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
5 Sep 2017 Editorially accepted
12 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12891-017-1754-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement