Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Hospital volume and the risk of revision in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the Nordic countries -an observational study of 14,496 cases

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Mar 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jashvant Poeran
24 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne Lubbeke
6 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Mona Badawy
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne Lubbeke
1 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jashvant Poeran
4 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Mona Badawy
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jashvant Poeran
31 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Mona Badawy
Resubmission - Version 4
31 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
31 Aug 2017 Editorially accepted
7 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12891-017-1750-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement