Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of continuous infusion versus bolus injection of factor concentrates for blood management after total knee arthroplasty in patients with hemophilia

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Feb 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christina Abdel Shaheed
19 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Leo Massari
13 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Youg Shil Park
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Youg Shil Park
Resubmission - Version 3
20 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Youg Shil Park
Resubmission - Version 4
30 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Youg Shil Park
Resubmission - Version 5
4 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
11 Aug 2017 Editorially accepted
22 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12891-017-1720-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement