Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Long-term outcome following additional rhBMP-7 application in revision surgery of aseptic humeral, femoral, and tibial shaft nonunion

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Mar 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
9 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Etienne Belzile
17 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stefan Landgraeber
28 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Simon Hackl
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Etienne Belzile
11 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stefan Landgraeber
29 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Simon Hackl
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Simon Hackl
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
31 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
7 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12891-017-1704-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement