Skip to main content

Table 3 The radiographic outcomes of the two groups

From: Comparison of low density and high density pedicle screw instrumentation in Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Variable

Low implant density

High implant density

(p-Value)

TWO WEEKS POSTOPERATION

 MT Cobb (°)

18.4 ± 8.0

14.3 ± 7.7

0.046

 Change of MT Cobb (°)

37.9 ± 7.9

38.4 ± 7.0

0.759

 Correction rate (%)

67.9 ± 12.3

74.3 ± 12.9

0.053

 AVT (mm)

17.0 ± 10.1

15.2 ± 9.1

0.474

 TTS (mm)

10.4 ± 7.5

11.1 ± 7.9

0.701

 TK (T5–T12)

19.5 ± 10.7

24.3 ± 10.0

0.071

 LL (T12–S1)

 PJK(°)

−49.3 ± 10.3

9.2 ± 5.2

−47.7 ± 10.5

9.2 ± 5.3

0.546

0.99

FINAL FOLLOW-UP

 MT Cobb (°)

18.3 ± 7.9

17.0 ± 8.4

0.550

 Change of MT Cobb (°)

34.5 ± 9.9

37.7 ± 8.5

0.175

 Correction rate (%)

65.0 ± 15.1

69.1 ± 14.5

0.275

 Loss of MT Cobb (°)

1.9 ± 5.1

1.4 ± 4.7

0.702

 AVT (mm)

14.4 ± 9.2

13.7 ± 9.1

0.781

 TTS (mm)

11.1 ± 9.8

10.6 ± 5.9

0.786

 TK Cobb (T5–T12, °)

22.3 ± 12.4

23.5 ± 9.8

0.658

 LL Cobb (T12–S1, °)

 PJK(°)

−53.8 ± 8.3

10.2 ± 6.7

−53.4 ± 10.1

13.4 ± 7.7

0.865

0.086

  1. MT main thoracic, AVT apical vertebra translation, TTS thoracic trunk shift, TK thoracic kyphosis, LL lumbar lordosis, PJK proximal junctional kyphosis