Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of artificial graft versus autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Mar 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Toshikazu Tanaka
11 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nobuaki Miyaji
17 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Zhenyu Jia
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wei Yang
9 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Zhenyu Jia
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wei Yang
10 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Zhenyu Jia
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
12 Jul 2017 Editorially accepted
19 Jul 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12891-017-1672-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement