Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: How clinicians analyze movement quality in patients with non-specific low back pain: a cross-sectional survey study with Dutch allied health care professionals

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carol Clark
8 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Hendrick
10 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Corey Simon
4 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Margriet van Dijk
Resubmission - Version 2
4 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Corey Simon
25 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Carol Clark
12 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Margriet van Dijk
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Margriet van Dijk
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
28 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
4 Jul 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12891-017-1649-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement