Skip to content


  • Review
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Magnetic resonance imaging of bacterial and tuberculous spondylodiscitis with associated complications and non-infectious spinal pathology mimicking infections: a pictorial review

  • Yogesh Kumar1,
  • Nishant Gupta2,
  • Avneesh Chhabra3,
  • Takeshi Fukuda4,
  • Neetu Soni5 and
  • Daichi Hayashi1, 6Email author
BMC Musculoskeletal DisordersBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:244

Received: 10 April 2017

Accepted: 30 May 2017

Published: 5 June 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
10 Apr 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
10 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eberhard Uhl
19 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeroen Geurts
23 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yogesh Kumar
Resubmission - Version 2
23 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
30 May 2017 Editorially accepted
5 Jun 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12891-017-1608-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Radiology, Yale New Haven Health System at Bridgeport Hospital, Bridgeport, USA
Department of Radiology, St. Vincent’s Medical Center, Bridgeport, USA
Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
Department of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Department of Neuroradiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, USA