Study
|
No. of implants
|
Mean follow-up (years)
|
Functional Assessment
|
Implant survival
|
---|
5 years
|
10 years
|
15 years
|
---|
Batta et al. [14]
|
69
|
10.4
|
N/A
|
73%
|
65%
|
55%
|
Biau et al.a [13]
|
91
|
5.2
|
N/A
|
76%
|
45%
|
29%
|
Bickels et al. [12]
|
110
|
7.8
|
N/A
|
93%
|
88%
|
N/A
|
Bus et al.a [25]
|
110
|
7.2
|
N/A
|
89% at follow-up
|
Coathup et al. [10]
|
61
|
8.5
|
N/A
|
89%
|
84%
|
75%
|
Griffin et al.a [9]
|
99
|
6.1
|
N/A
|
82%
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Kinkel et al.a [8]
|
77
|
3.8
|
N/A
|
57%
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Morgan et al.a [7]
|
105
|
4.8
|
N/A
|
73%
|
59%
|
N/A
|
Myers et al.[6]
|
335
|
12
|
N/A
|
83%
|
67%
|
51%
|
Pala et al.a [5]
|
247
|
4
|
N/A
|
70% at 4 years
|
48% at 8 years
| |
Plötz et al.a [15]
|
60
|
4.9
|
N/A
|
34%
|
25%
|
N/A
|
Ruggieri et al.b [4]
|
669
|
11
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
80%
|
55% at 20 years
|
Schwartz et al. [3]
|
186
|
8
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
77%
|
N/A
|
-
aStudy reports on distal femoral and proximal tibial replacement
-
bStudy reports on distal femoral, total femoral, and proximal tibial replacement