Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Early surgery with antibiotics treatment had better clinical outcomes than antibiotics treatment alone in patients with pyogenic spondylodiscitis: a retrospective cohort study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeroen Geurts
2 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yong Ahn
8 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yan Li
2 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Tsung-Ting Tsai
Resubmission - Version 2
2 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeroen Geurts
15 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yan Li
18 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yong Ahn
22 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Tsung-Ting Tsai
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jeroen Geurts
7 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Tsung-Ting Tsai
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
21 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
27 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12891-017-1533-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement