Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Operative versus conservative treatment of apophyseal avulsion fractures of the pelvis in the adolescents: a systematical review with meta-analysis of clinical outcome and return to sports

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roland Böhm
26 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Johannes KM Fakler
7 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Helge Eberbach
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Helge Eberbach
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Helge Eberbach
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
7 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
19 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12891-017-1527-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement