Psychological predictors of change in the number of musculoskeletal pain sites among Norwegian employees: a prospective study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|20 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wim Peersman|
|30 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Serigne Lo|
|3 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Jan Olav Christensen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wim Peersman|
|20 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Serigne Lo|
|22 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Jan Olav Christensen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|4 Apr 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12891-017-1503-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.