Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Managing uncertainty - a qualitative study of surgeons’ decision-making for one-stage and two-stage revision surgery for prosthetic hip joint infection

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gary Hooper
1 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Samantha Bunzli
23 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Andrew Moore
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
5 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Samantha Bunzli
13 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gary Hooper
13 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Andrew Moore
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gary Hooper
30 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Samantha Bunzli
7 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Andrew Moore
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Andrew Moore
Resubmission - Version 5
15 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
22 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
12 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12891-017-1499-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement