Clinical course and prognosis of musculoskeletal pain in patients referred for physiotherapy: does pain site matter?
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|30 Sep 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nicola Heneghan|
|4 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - K Walker-Bone|
|16 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Jakob Hjort|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nicola Heneghan|
|9 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - K Walker-Bone|
|13 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Nils-o de Vos|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|29 Mar 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12891-017-1487-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.