Skip to main content

Table 1 Patient demographics and results

From: Comparison of the direct and indirect reduction techniques during the surgical management of posterior malleolar fractures

 

Direct reduction group

Indirect reduction group

P value

No. of patients

64

52

 

Gender

 Male

28

31

0.097

 Female

36

21

Lauge-Hansen classification

 Pronation-external rotation

12

12

0.647

 Supination-external rotation

52

40

AO/OTA classification

 44B3

47

35

0.344

 44C1

4

3

 44C2

11

13

 44C3

2

1

Injury mechanism

 Low-energy

50

43

0.642

 High-energy

14

9

Age (Yr.)

49.0 ± 12.4

48.1 ± 15.2

0.751

Time before surgery (days)

4.3 ± 2.0

4.5 ± 2.8

0.733

Quality of reduction

 Excellent

34 (53.1%)

16 (30.8%)

0.038*

 Good

25 (39.1%)

27 (51.9%)

 Poor

5 (7.8%)

9 (17.3%)

Follow-up duration (months)

19.9 ± 5.2

20.0 ± 5.8

0.882

AOFAS

87 (58 to 95)

80 (59 to 95)

0.034*

Dorsiflexion restriction (°)

5.2 ± 4.5

6.1 ± 4.3

0.331

VAS

2 (0 to 7)

2 (0 to 7)

0.419

  1. *P < 0.05