The importance of informational, clinical and personal support in patient experience with total knee replacement: a qualitative investigation
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shaw-Ruey Lyu|
|11 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - DF Hamilton|
|22 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Laurie Goldsmith|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - DF Hamilton|
|12 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shaw-Ruey Lyu|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|24 Mar 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12891-017-1474-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.