Skip to main content

Table 6 Relative MCID of 30% improvement after total hip replacement

From: Patient-reported health outcomes after total hip and knee surgery in a Dutch University Hospital Setting: results of twenty years clinical registry

 

Primary hip replacementb

Revisionsc

 

T = 6 months

T = 12 months

T = 6 months

T = 12 months

Harris Hip Score

84.5% (N = 373)

86.6% (N = 419)

59.3% (N = 91)

66.3% (N = 104)

Oxford Hip Scorea

88.8% (N = 347)

91.5% (N = 365)

61.8% (N = 89)

67.1% (N = 85)

VAS pain (rest)a

88.9% (N = 348)

91.3% (N = 357)

74.4% (N = 73)

76.8% (N = 82)

VAS pain (exercise)a

84.5% (N = 375)

91.1% (N = 403)

67.4% (N = 95)

74.7% (N = 99)

  1. HHS Harris Hip Score, OHS Oxford Hip Score, VAS Visual Analog Scale
  2. aPatients with pre-operative score of 0 points were equaled to 1 point, because it is not possible to establish relative differences from a baseline value 0
  3. bPrimary hip replacement: HHS: 4.9% excluded because of ceiling. OHS: 4.7% excluded because of ceiling. VAS pain rest: 15.4% were excluded because of ceiling. VAS pain exercise: 2.2% were excluded because of ceiling
  4. cRevisions: HHS: 12.7% excluded because of ceiling. OHS: 9.7% excluded because of ceiling. VAS pain rest: 24% were excluded because of ceiling. VAS pain exercise: 8.9% were excluded because of ceiling
Back to article page

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us