Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Cervical spine reposition errors after cervical flexion and extension

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Oct 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Markus J Ernst
5 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James M Elliott
28 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Xu Wang
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James M Elliott
13 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Markus J Ernst
29 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Xu Wang
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Xu Wang
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
15 Feb 2017 Editorially accepted
13 Mar 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12891-017-1454-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement