Study | Country | Number of cases | Mean age (years) | MR procedure | Lesion analyzed | Sensitivity (percent) | Specificity (percent) | TP (n) | FP (n) | FN (n) | TN (n) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anderson, L. A. 2009 [17] | USA | 27 | N/S | dMRA | Acetabular chondral delamination | 22 | 100 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 18 |
Bittersohl, B. 2011 [40] | Switzerland | 16 | 31 | iMRA 1.5Â T (morphologic) | Combined chondral lesions | 57 | 88 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
iMRA 1.5Â T (dGEMRIC) | Combined chondral lesions | 75 | 33 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 3 | ||||
Lattanzi, R. 2014 [27] | USA | 20 | N/S | iMRA 3Â T(dGEMRIC) | Combined chondral lesions | 52 | 67 | N/S | N/S | N/S | N/S |
Lattanzi, R. 2012 [28] | USA | 10 | 19.9 | iMRA 1.5Â T (morphologic) | Combined chondral lesions | 47 | 79 | N/S | N/S | N/S | N/S |
iMRA 1.5Â T (dGEMRIC) | Combined chondral lesions | 71 | 36 | N/S | N/S | N/S | N/S | ||||
Pfirrmann, C. W. 2008 [32] | Switzerland | 44 | 30.7 (16–49) | dMRA 1.5 T | Acetabular chondral delamination | 74 | 90 | 17 | 2 | 6 | 19 |
Schmid, M. R. 2003 [15] | Switzerland | 42 | 37 | dMRA 1.0Â T | Combined chondral lesions | 79 | 77 | 15 | 5 | 4 | 18 |
Femoral head chondral lesions | 60 | 88 | N/S | N/S | N/S | N/S | |||||
Zaragoza, E. 2009 [16] | Canada, USA | 48 | 38.8 | dMRA 1.5Â T | Acetabular chondral delamination | 79 | 84 | 28 | 3 | 1 | 16 |
Aprato, A. 2013 [33] | Italy | 41 | 23-25 | dMRA 1.5Â T | Acetabular chondral lesions | 69 | 88 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 22 |
Femoral head chondral lesions | 46 | 81 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 22 | |||||
Labral lesions | 91 | 86 | 31 | 3 | 1 | 6 | |||||
Banks, D. B. 2012 [36] | United Kingdom | 69 | N/S | dMRA 1.5Â T | Combined chondral lesions | 17 | 100 | 6 | 0 | 29 | 34 |
Labral lesions | 81 | 51 | 13 | 26 | 3 | 27 | |||||
Crespo Rodriguez, A. M. 2014 [37] | Spain | 51 | 43 ± 9 | dMRA 1.5 T | Combined chondral lesions | 92 | 54 | 37 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
Labral lesions | 95 | 100 | 35 | 0 | 2 | 14 | |||||
Gonzalez Gil, A. B. 2015 [31] | Spain | 36 | 39 | dMRA – 3 T | Acetabular chondral lesions | 78.78 | 81.81 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 18 |
Femoral head chondral lesions | 71.43 | 72.72 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 16 | |||||
Labral lesions | 86.95 | 76.92 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 10 | |||||
James, S. L. 2006 [29] | United Kingdom, Australia | 46 | 32.3 | cMRI – 1.5 T | Acetabular chondral lesions | 94 | 100 | N/S | N/S | N/S | N/S |
Femoral head chondral lesions | 100 | 94 | N/S | N/S | N/S | N/S | |||||
Labral lesions | 100 | 100 | N/S | N/S | N/S | N/S | |||||
McGuire, C. M. 2012 [13] | Ireland | 61 | 32 | dMRA – 1.5 T (31 cases) | Acetabular chondral lesions | 86 | 50 | 25 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
Femoral head chondral lesions | 85 | 44 | 12 | 8 | 3 | 8 | |||||
Labral lesions | 96 | 33 | 25 | 4 | 1 | 1 | |||||
cMRI – 1.5 T (30 cases) | Acetabular chondral lesions | 78 | 33 | 21 | 2 | 6 | 1 | ||||
Femoral head chondral lesions | 69 | 43 | 10 | 9 | 5 | 6 | |||||
Labral lesions | 86 | 100 | 25 | 0 | 4 | 1 | |||||
Perdikakis, E. 2011 [30] | Greece | 14 | 43 | dMRA 1.5Â T | Combined chondral lesions | 63 | 33 | N/S | N/S | N/S | N/S |
Labral lesions | 100 | 50 | N/S | N/S | N/S | N/S | |||||
Petchprapa, C. N. 2015 [21] | USA | 41 | 33-35 | iMRA 3Â T | Acetabular chondral lesions | 69 | 89 | N/S | N/S | N/S | N/S |
Femoral head chondral lesions | 69 | 95 | N/S | N/S | N/S | N/S | |||||
Labral lesions | 89 | 99 | N/S | N/S | N/S | N/S | |||||
Sahin, M. 2014 [38] | Turkey | 14 | 35 | dMRA – 1.5 T | Acetabular chondral lesions | 89 | 40 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
Femoral head chondral lesions | 100 | 90 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 9 | |||||
Labral lesions | 100 | 50 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 2 | |||||
Sutter, R. 2014 [12] | Switzerland | 28 | 31.8 | dMRA – 1.5 T | Acetabular chondral lesions | 91 | 25 | 22 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Femoral head chondral lesions | 50 | 90 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 20 | |||||
Labral lesions | 89 | 50 | 23 | 1 | 3 | 1 | |||||
cMRI – 1.5 T | Acetabular chondral lesions | 83 | 50 | 20 | 2 | 4 | 2 | ||||
Femoral head chondral lesions | 50 | 100 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 22 | |||||
Labral lesions | 89 | 50 | 23 | 1 | 3 | 1 | |||||
Zlatkin, M. B. 2010 [35] | USA | 14 | 39.0 | iMRA 1.5Â T | Combined chondral lesions | 81 | 100 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
Labral lesions | 100 | 100 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |||||
cMRI 1.5Â T | Combined chondral lesions | 81 | 100 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 3 | ||||
Labral lesions | 84 | 100 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |||||
Reurink, G. 2012 [34] | Netherlands | 95 | 41.3 | dMRA 1.5Â T | Labral lesions | 86 | 75 | 78 | 1 | 13 | 3 |
Studler, U. 2008 [39] | Switzerland | 57 | 35.0 | dMRA 1.5Â T | Labral lesions | 97 | 53 | 43 | 6 | 1 | 7 |
Tian, C. Y. 2014 [14] | China | 90 | 35.1 | dMRA 3Â T | Labral lesions | 95 | 84 | N/S | N/S | N/S | N/S |
cMRI 3Â T | Labral lesions | 66 | 77 | 39 | 7 | 20 | 24 |