Skip to main content

Table 2 Website credibility, quality and design

From: Evaluating on-line health information for patients with polymyalgia rheumatica: a descriptive study

Variable

Measure

n (%) meeting criteriaa

Credibility and Quality [11]

Authorshipb

11 (21)

Affiliationb

46 (88)

Editorial teamb

10 (19)

Date of creationb

8 (15)

Date of updateb

19 (37)

Backingb

13 (25)

Accreditationb

11 (21)

Financingb

1 (2)

Credibility Indicator

Mean (SD): 2 (1)

Coherence of the title

51 (98)

Contact

36 (69)

Validity of the links (first 3)

48 (92)

Coherence of the links

50 (96)

Help

8 (15)

Font size

14 (27)

Information management

28 (54)

Declaration of conflict of interests

0 (0)

Objectivity

0 (0)

Site traffic statistics

0 (0)

Website search engine

42 (81)

Accessibility

52 (100)

Interoperability

52 (100)

Editorial policy

0 (0)

Design [12, 13]

Use of consistent designs, font sizes, and styles

52 (100)

Video/audio illustration

5 (7)

Use a sans serif font for text

51 (98)

Use of short sentences and an active voice

47 (90)

Avoidance of jargon/technical language

45 (87)

Use bulleted lists rather than large blocks of text

20 (38)

Q&A section

4 (8)

Use at least a 12-point font

51 (98)

‘Chunk’ information into meaningful sections with clear headings

44 (85)

Leave right margins jagged (i.e. do not justify)

52 (100)

Avoid percentages (‘one out of ten’ rather than ‘10%’)

18 (35)

Use numerals rather than spelling out numbers

46 (88)

Supplement with illustrations

8 (15)

Use of upper and lower case (avoids using all capital letters, italics, and fancy script)

50 (96)

  1. aUnless otherwise stated
  2. bVariables included in the Credibility Indicator [11]