Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Accuracy of clinical neurological examination in diagnosing lumbo-sacral radiculopathy: a systematic literature review

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Jun 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephen May
22 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ramakrishnan Mani
14 Oct 2016 Author responded Author comments - Nassib Tawa
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Oct 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephen May
6 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ramakrishnan Mani
10 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Nassib Tawa
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ramakrishnan Mani
20 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Nassib Tawa
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
23 Dec 2016 Editorially accepted
23 Feb 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12891-016-1383-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement