Skip to main content

Table 3 Mean (±SD) of the baseline and follow-up scans, mean (±SD) of both measurements, root-mean-square precision error (CV%RMS) for stiffness, apparent stiffness, average von Mises stress, and failure load from 3 different FE models at the distal tibia in postmenopausal women

From: In vivo precision of three HR-pQCT-derived finite element models of the distal radius and tibia in postmenopausal women

Tibia (n = 32)

First scan

± SD

Second scan

± SD

Mean

± SD

CV%RMS

Single Tissue Model (STM)

 Stiffness

(kN/mm)

172.7

± 33.7

173.1

± 34.1

172.9

± 33.7

3.7

 Apparent Modulus

(MPa)

1896.8

± 375.2

1908.3

± 374.3

1902.5

± 372.0

4.0

 Average von Mises Stress

(MPa)

66.6

± 5.8

66.8

± 5.4

66.7

± 5.1

4.8

 Failure Load

(kN)

8.746

± 1.570

8.761

± 1.587

8.754

± 1.571

2.7

Dual Tissue Model (DTM)

 Stiffness

(kN/mm)

316.1

± 60.9

317.2

± 61.8

316.6

± 61.0

3.4

 Apparent Modulus

(MPa)

3477.5

± 685.3

3500.6

± 685.3

3489.1

± 680.7

3.8

 Average von Mises Stress

(MPa)

120.6

± 10.2

120.9

± 9.4

120.7

± 9.3

3.8

 Failure Load

(kN)

7.256

± 1.345

7.267

± 1.360

7.261

± 1.345

2.9

Cortical Bone

 Average von Mises Stress

(MPa)

166.4

± 5.4

166.6

± 5.6

166.5

± 5.5

0.8

 % Minimum Load Carried

(%)

41.5

± 9.1

41.9

± 9.7

41.7

± 9.4

3.5

 % Maximum Load Carried

(%)

61.6

± 9.9

61.8

± 10.2

61.7

± 10.0

2.1

Trabecular Bone

 Average von Mises Stress

(MPa)

97.9

± 11.6

97.8

± 11.4

97.9

± 10.8

5.9

 % Minimum Load Carried

(%)

58.5

± 9.1

58.2

± 9.7

58.3

± 9.4

2.6

 % Maximum Load Carried

(%)

38.4

± 9.9

38.2

± 10.2

38.3

± 10.0

3.5

Scaled E-BMD Model

 Stiffness

(kN/mm)

118.7

± 27.8

118.7

± 27.5

118.8

± 27.6

2.1

 Apparent Modulus

(MPa)

910.6

± 223.7

912.8

± 224.9

911.7

± 224.0

1.8

 Average von Mises Stress

(MPa)

16.7

± 3.3

16.8

± 3.2

16.7

± 3.2

2.0

 Failure Load

(kN)

3.558

± 0.802

3.556

± 0.797

3.557

± 0.797

2.5