Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Is PEEK cage better than titanium cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery? A meta-analysis

study

group

Gender (M/F)

Age(Y)

Segments (one/two/three)

Diseases(T/P)

Cage information

Follow-up(m)

Chou YC et al. 2008 [12]

TTN

11/16

55.2

43(14/10/3)

Trauma(1/2)

spondylosis(10/0)

OPLL(1/0) HIVD(15/7)

Non-threaded cage containing a biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic

12

PEEK

6/3

54.2

15(3/6/0)

containing a biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic

12

Niu CC et al. 2010 [19]

TTN

15/13

49.5 ± 11.3

37(19/9/0)

Radiculopathy(21/9)

Myelopathy(3/3)

Radiculomyelopathy(4/3)

hydroxyapatite-coated, box-shaped device with a tooth-threaded surface filled with a local bone graft and a calcium phosphate bone substitute

31.9 ± 3.4

PEEK

12/13

52.2 ± 10.5

34(16/9/0)

filled with allo-cancellous bone graft

30.4 ± 3.3

Cabraja M et al. 2012 [20]

TTN

26/18

51.1 ± 8.9

44(1/0/0)

Radiculopathy(36/34)

Myelopathy(8/8)

with Plasmapore coating

30.6 ± 14.3

PEEK

28/14

57.6 ± 11.1

42(1/0/0)

N

26.1 ± 10.0

Chen Y et al. 2013 [22]

TTN

17/12

45.7 ± 7.2

87(0/0/3)

Radiculopathy(16/18)

Myelopathy(1/1)

Radiculomyelopathy(12/12)

N

97.2

PEEK

16/15

47.2 ± 6.8

93(0/0/3)

N

102.1

  1. Notes: TTN, Titanium, PEEK polyetheretherketone, OPLL ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, HIVD herniated intervertebral disc, N non-mentioned