Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Is PEEK cage better than titanium cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery? A meta-analysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Nov 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chris Christou
16 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Serdar Kahraman
26 Apr 2016 Author responded Author comments - Zhi-jun Li
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Apr 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chris Christou
3 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Serdar Kahraman
31 May 2016 Author responded Author comments - Zhi-jun Li
Resubmission - Version 3
31 May 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Jun 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chris Christou
21 Jun 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Serdar Kahraman
1 Jul 2016 Author responded Author comments - Zhi-jun Li
Resubmission - Version 4
1 Jul 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
24 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chris Christou
21 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - Zhi-jun Li
Resubmission - Version 5
21 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
24 Aug 2016 Editorially accepted
1 Sep 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12891-016-1234-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement