Skip to main content

Table 4 Risk of bias results for the studies included in the review

From: The pathophysiology associated with primary (idiopathic) frozen shoulder: A systematic review

 

Bunker [39]

Carbone et al. [31]

Carrillon et al. [32]

Kilian et al. [33]

Lho et al. [19]

Li et al. [34]

Manton et al. [35]

Neviaser

[40]

Sofka et al. [14]

Song et al. [36]

Uhthoff & Boileau [41]

Xu et al. [37]

Zhao et al. [38]

1. Did the study address a clearly focused issue?

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

2. Did the authors use an appropriate method to answer their question?

Yes

Arthroscopy and Open Release

Yes

MRI – No comment on contrast

Yes

MRI - Contrast

Yes

Arthroscopy

Yes

Arthroscopy

Yes

MRI – No comment on contrast

Yes

Direct MRA

Yes

Arthrography

Yes

MRI – No Comment On Contrast

Yes

Indirect MRI

Yes

Arthroscopy

Yes

Arthroscopy

Yes

MRI– No Comment On Contrast

3. Were the cases recruited in an acceptable way?

No

SoC

N = 35

Yes

SoC

N = 50

Yes

SoC

N = 25

No

SoC

N = 6

No

SoC

N = 17

Yes

SoC

N = 72

No

SoC

N = 9

No

SoC

N = 1

Yes

SoC

N = 47

Yes

SoC

N = 35

No

SoC

N = 4

Can’t Tell

N = 8

Can’t Tell

N = 60

4. Were the controls selected in an acceptable way?

No

No Control Group

Yes

50 Cuff Tear

65 Control

No

No Control Group

Yes

6 Control

Yes

7 Control

Yes

120 controls

Yes

19 Control

No

No Control Group

No

No Control Group

Yes

45 Control

No

No Control Group

Can’t Tell

10 Control

Can’t Tell

60 Control

6. (a) What confounding factors have the authors accounted for?

None Recorded

Gender

Age

Duration of symptoms

Stage of condition

Previous Mx

Gender

Age

Duration of symptoms

Stage of condition

Comorbidities

Previous Mx

Gender

Age

Duration of symptoms

Previous Mx

Comorbidity

Gender

Age

Previous

Mx

None Recorded

Gender

Age

Stage of condition

Symptom duration

Gender

Age

Gender

Age

Comorbidity

Duration of symptoms

Gender

Age

Comorbidity

Duration Of Symptoms

Gender

Age

Comorbidity

Ethnicity

Duration of Symptoms

(b) Have the authors taken account of the potential confounding factors in the design and/or in their analysis?

No

Yes

Age Comparable Groups - Fs & Rc Tear

No

Yes

Stage of condition and Sample

No

Yes

Gender affect

Yes

Comorbidity

Different treatment of Control Group/ “Normals”

No

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

7. Can the results be applied to the local population?

Can’t Tell

No

Diagnostic Test described awaiting validation

Yes

Can’t Tell

No

Yes

No

No

Yes

Can’t Tell

No

Can’t Tell

Yes

8. Do the results of this study fit with other available evidence?

Can’t Tell

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

No

Can’t Tell

Yes

Yes

Yes

Can’t Tell

Yes

Overall risk of bias

High

Low

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Low

Mod

High

Low

Mod

Moderate

Moderate

Low

  1. Mx management, SoC Sample of Convenience, MRI Magnetic Resonance Imaging)