Table 4 Implant type/technique and adjusted risk of revision^a

Abdel, M. et al., 2011 [36]

Cruciate Status:

Posterior cruciate-retaining

Posterior cruciate-stabilizing

0.5, 95 % CI 0.4 - 0.6, p < 0.001

Rand, J. et al., 2003 [19]

Cruciate Status:

Posterior Stabilized

Posterior cruciate-retaining

2.6, 95 % CI 2.1 - 3.5, p < 0.0001

Constrained condylar

Posterior cruciate-retaining

2.1, 95 % CI 0.9 - 4.9, p = 0.08

Stiehl J. et al., 2006 [24]

Cruciate Status

PCRs

Rotating platform

1.552, 95 % CI 1.157 - 2.081

BCRs

2.188, 95 % CI 1.454 - 3.294

Gøthesen, O. et al., 2013 [17]

Implant Type:

Duracon

Profix

2.6, 95 % CI 1.9 - 3.4, p < 0.001

LCS Classic HR

1.3, 95 % CI 1.0 - 1.6, p = 0.017

LCS Complete

1.5, 95 % CI 1.1 - 1.9, p = 0.002

AGC Universal

1.6, 95 % CI 1.3 - 2.0, p < 0.001

Lygre, S. et al., 2010 [37]

Implant Type:

Relative Risk =

NR Tricon

NR AGC Universal

1.67, 95 % CI 1.24–2.24, p = 0.001,

NR Genesis 1

1.43, 95 % CI 1.14–1.79, p = 0.002,

NR Duracon

1.45, 95 % CI 1.05–1.99, p = 002.

NR Profix

0.66, 95 % CI 0.52–0.82, p < 0.001,

NR e.motion

0.09, 95 % CI 0.02–0.37, p = 0.001,

NR AGC anatomic

0.66, 95 % CI 0.45–0.99, p = 0.04,

PR AGC universal

0.48, 95 % CI 0.27–0.83, p = 0.009,

PR NexGen

0.40, 95 % CI 0.22–0.74, p = 0.004.

Namba R. et al., 2013 [28]

Implant Type:

Rotate LCS

Fixed PS

2.07, 95 % CI 1.53 - 2.80, p < 0.001

High flexion

Yes versus No

1.76, 95 % CI 1.29 - 2.41, p < 0.001

Namba R. et al., 2012 [27]

Implant Type:

LCS

Fixed

2.01, 95 % CI 1.41 - 2.86, p < 0.001

Inacio M. et al., 2013 [54]

Bearing or inserts:

CoCr-HXLPE

CoCr-CPE

NS 1.2, 95 % CI 0.9 - 1.5, p > 0.05

OZ-CPE

C0Cr-CPE

NS 1.4, 95 % CI 0.3 - 5.9, p > 0.05