From: Risk factors for revision of total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review
Author(s)/Year | Age | Hazard ratio (95 % CI) unless otherwise stated |
---|---|---|
Bini, S. et al., 2013 [31] | >55 years | 0.43, 95 % CI 0.27 to 0.67, p < 0.001 |
Blum, M. et al., 2013 [29] | 18–64 years vs. 65+ yrs | 2.30, 95 % CI 1.96 to 2.69, p < 0.0001 |
Bordini, B. et al., 2009 [32] | Age at surgery (per year) | 1.05, 95 % CI 1.03 to 1.06, p = 0.0001 |
Fehring, T. et al., 2004 [52] | Age at surgery (per year) | 0.953, 99 % CI 0.932 to 0.975, p < 0.0001 |
Gioe, T. et al., 2004 [53] | Age <70 year | 0.46, 95 % CI.0.33 to 0.64, p < 0.001 |
Harrysson, O. et al., 2004 [43] | Older patients (≥60 year) Revision Attributable to Any Reason Revision Attributable to Loosening of Components | 0.49, 95 % CI 0.38 to 0.62, p < 0.0001 0.41, 95 % CI 0.27 to 0.62, p < 0.0001 |
Julin, J. et al., 2010 [35] | Age ≤ 55 years: Revision for reasons other than infection Revision for any reason | 2.9, 95 % CI 2.3 to 3.6 2.4, 95 % CI 2.0 to 3.0 Age 56–65 years |
Age 56–65 years: Revision for reasons other than infection Revision for any reason : | 1.7 95 % CI 1.4 to 2.0 1.5, 95 % CI 1.3 to 1.7 | |
Kreder, H. et al., 2003 [25] | Younger age per 10Â year: At 1Â year after revision At 3Â years after revision | OR 0.77, 95Â % CI 0.67 to 0.89 OR 0.70, 95Â % CI 0.66 to 0.81 |
Lygre, S. et al., 2011 [37] | Age >70 year vs. <60 year | 0.4, 95 % CI 0.3–0.4, 0 < 0.001 |
Namba, R. et al., 2013 [28] | Age (increasing 10 year increments) | 0.62, 95 % CI 0.57 to 0.67, p < 0.001 |
Namba, R. et al., 2012 [27] | Age (increasing 10 year increments) | 0.64, 95 % CI 0.58 to 0.70, p < 0.001 |
Rand, J. et al., 2003 [19] | Age 56–70 year vs. ≤55 years Age >70 year vs. ≤55 years | 0.7, 95 % CI 0.5 to 0.9, p < 0.01 0.5, 95 % CI 0.3 to 0.6, p < 0.0001 |
Stiehl, J. et al., 2006 [24] | Younger patients (for every yr increase) | 0.979, 95Â % CI 0.968 to 0.989 |