Skip to main content

Table 3 Age and adjusted risk of revisiona

From: Risk factors for revision of total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review

Author(s)/Year Age Hazard ratio (95 % CI)
unless otherwise stated
Bini, S. et al., 2013 [31] >55 years 0.43, 95 % CI 0.27 to 0.67, p < 0.001
Blum, M. et al., 2013 [29] 18–64 years vs. 65+ yrs 2.30, 95 % CI 1.96 to 2.69, p < 0.0001
Bordini, B. et al., 2009 [32] Age at surgery (per year) 1.05, 95 % CI 1.03 to 1.06, p = 0.0001
Fehring, T. et al., 2004 [52] Age at surgery (per year) 0.953, 99 % CI 0.932 to 0.975, p < 0.0001
Gioe, T. et al., 2004 [53] Age <70 year 0.46, 95 % CI.0.33 to 0.64, p < 0.001
Harrysson, O. et al., 2004 [43] Older patients (≥60 year)
Revision Attributable to Any Reason
Revision Attributable to Loosening of Components
0.49, 95 % CI 0.38 to 0.62, p < 0.0001
0.41, 95 % CI 0.27 to 0.62, p < 0.0001
Julin, J. et al., 2010 [35] Age ≤ 55 years:
Revision for reasons other than infection
Revision for any reason
2.9, 95 % CI 2.3 to 3.6
2.4, 95 % CI 2.0 to 3.0 Age 56–65 years
Age 56–65 years:
Revision for reasons other than infection
Revision for any reason :
1.7 95 % CI 1.4 to 2.0
1.5, 95 % CI 1.3 to 1.7
Kreder, H. et al., 2003 [25] Younger age per 10 year:
At 1 year after revision
At 3 years after revision
OR 0.77, 95 % CI 0.67 to 0.89
OR 0.70, 95 % CI 0.66 to 0.81
Lygre, S. et al., 2011 [37] Age >70 year vs. <60 year 0.4, 95 % CI 0.3–0.4, 0 < 0.001
Namba, R. et al., 2013 [28] Age (increasing 10 year increments) 0.62, 95 % CI 0.57 to 0.67, p < 0.001
Namba, R. et al., 2012 [27] Age (increasing 10 year increments) 0.64, 95 % CI 0.58 to 0.70, p < 0.001
Rand, J. et al., 2003 [19] Age 56–70 year vs. ≤55 years
Age >70 year vs. ≤55 years
0.7, 95 % CI 0.5 to 0.9, p < 0.01
0.5, 95 % CI 0.3 to 0.6, p < 0.0001
Stiehl, J. et al., 2006 [24] Younger patients (for every yr increase) 0.979, 95 % CI 0.968 to 0.989
  1. aSee Additional file 2 for further detail