From: Risk factors for revision of total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review
Author(s), year | Duration of follow-up (yrs) | Index procedure (n) | Revision (n) | Survival rate (%, CI) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Badawy M. et al., 2013 [42] | 10 | 26,698 | 1169 | Low hospital volumeb: 92.5Â %, 95Â % CI 91.5 to 93.4 High hospital volume: 95.5Â %, 95Â % CI 94.1 to 97.0 |
Gothesen, Ø. et al., 2013 [17] | 10 | 17,782 | NR | 89.5 to 95.3 %, CI- NR |
Himanen, A. et al., 2007 [20] | 10 | 751 | 37 | Prosthetic moulded component: 94.4Â %, 95Â % CI 90.4 to 96.7 Prosthetic modular component: 93.6Â %, 95Â % CI 89.7 to 96.0 |
Jämsen, E. et al., 2013 [21] | 10 | 53,007 | 1919 | 94.5 %, 95 % CI 94.1 to 94.8 |
Rand, J. et al., 2003 [19] | 10 | 11,606 | NR | 91Â %, 95Â % CI 90 to 91Â % |
Vessely, M. et al., 2006 [18] | 10 | 1000 | 45 | 98.6Â %, 95Â % CI 97.8 to 99.4 |
Fang, D. et al., 2009 [23] | 20 | 6070 | 51 | 99Â %, CI - NR |
Rand, J. et al., 2003 [19] | 20 | 11,606 | NR | 78Â %, 95Â % CI 74 to 81Â % |