Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of DECT scanning in patients with tophaceous gout

From: Dual-energy computed tomography has limited sensitivity for non-tophaceous gout: a comparison study with tophaceous gout

Patient

Crystal-proven diagnosis

MSU deposits evident by DECT

Correlation of clinical and radiographic findings with DECT imaging for MSU deposits

Evidence for tophaceous disease

Site of tophi

DECT MSU deposit at site

12

No

Yes

Erosions on radiograph

Left 1st MTP

+

13

Yes

Yes

Surgical specimen

Left wrist

+

   

Erosions on radiograph

Right 2nd MTP

+

14

No

Yes

Erosions on radiograph

Right 1st MTP

-

15

Yes

Yes

Palpable tophi

Right olecranon bursa

Left olecranon bursa

+

+

   

Erosions on radiograph

Right 1st MTP

+

16

Yes

Yes

Surgical specimen

Right peroneus tendon

-

17

Yes

Yes

Palpable tophi

Dorsum right long finger PIP

Dorsum right little finger PIP

Upper extremity DECT not done

18

Yes

Yes

Erosions on radiograph

Right carpus

Left ring finger PIP

-

-

19

No

Yes

Palpable tophi

Right Olecranon bursa

Left olecranon bursa

Left ulnar styloid

Dorsum left ring finger MCP

Right thumb pad

Volar left little finger PIP

Right index fingertip pad

Right 1st MTP

Left 1st MTP

-

+

-

-

+

-

+

+

+

20

Yes

Yes

Palpable tophi

Left thumb MP

Left little MCP

Left index PIP

Left long PIP radial aspect

Left ring PIP

Left little between PIP/DIP dorsal

Right index PIP

Right little DIP

Right long PIP

Dorsum left foot

Dorsolateral left ankle

Lateral left midfoot

Right 1st MTP

Right 2nd DIP (draining)

+

+

+

+

-

+

+

-

+

+

+

+

+

+

   

Erosions on radiograph

Right carpus

Right index PIP

Right little DIP

+

+

+

21

Yes

Yes

Surgical specimen

Left 1st MTP

+

   

Erosions on radiograph

Left 1st MTP

+

   

Palpable tophus

Left 1st MTP

+