Comparison of patients in three different rehabilitation settings after knee or hip arthroplasty: a natural observational, prospective study

Table 2 Functional mobility

	Ambulatory treatment			Cure			Inpatient rehabilitation			p at T0			p at T1
	n	T0	T1	n	T0	T1	n	T0	T1	AT vs Cure	AT vs IR	Cure vs IR	AT vs Cure	AT vs IR	Cure vs IR
TUG (s)	89	11.7 (6.6)	27.5 (18.2)	39	10.8 (3.4)	33.9 (22.0)	52	12.0 (5.1)	40.0 (32.8)	0.910	0.040*	0.085	0.169	0.001*	0.252
ILOAS	87	0.8 (2.4)	12.2 (5.0)	34	0.4 (0.9)	13.9 (6.0)	48	1.5 (3.4)	16.0 (7.0)	0.494	0.202	0.133	0.102	0.000*	0.044*

All values are arithmetic mean (standard deviation). n number of complete data sets, T0 admission to hospital, T1 discharge from hospital (postoperative), TUG Timed Up and Go, ILOAS Iowa Level of Assistance Scale, s seconds, * statistical significance with p < 0.050

ISSN: 1471-2474