Skip to main content

Table 2 Functional mobility

From: Comparison of patients in three different rehabilitation settings after knee or hip arthroplasty: a natural observational, prospective study

  Ambulatory treatment Cure Inpatient rehabilitation p at T0 p at T1
  n T0 T1 n T0 T1 n T0 T1 AT vs Cure AT vs IR Cure vs IR AT vs Cure AT vs IR Cure vs IR
TUG (s) 89 11.7 (6.6) 27.5 (18.2) 39 10.8 (3.4) 33.9 (22.0) 52 12.0 (5.1) 40.0 (32.8) 0.910 0.040* 0.085 0.169 0.001* 0.252
ILOAS 87 0.8 (2.4) 12.2 (5.0) 34 0.4 (0.9) 13.9 (6.0) 48 1.5 (3.4) 16.0 (7.0) 0.494 0.202 0.133 0.102 0.000* 0.044*
  1. All values are arithmetic mean (standard deviation). n number of complete data sets, T0 admission to hospital, T1 discharge from hospital (postoperative), TUG Timed Up and Go, ILOAS Iowa Level of Assistance Scale, s seconds, * statistical significance with p < 0.050
\