Skip to main content

Table 2 Mean and standard deviation, 95Ā % CI of EMG activity of the VMO and VL muscles

From: Vastus medialis oblique and vastus lateralis activity during a double-leg semisquat with or without hip adduction in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome

Ā 

VL

VMO

Ā 

MF(Hz)

MPF(Hz)

RMS(Ī¼V)

IEMG(Ī¼Vs)

MF(Hz)

MPF(Hz)

RMS(Ī¼V)

IEMG(Ī¼Vs)

DS*

56.66ā€‰Ā±ā€‰5.53

68.14ā€‰Ā±ā€‰6.38

103.31ā€‰Ā±ā€‰44.54

8.02ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.45

55.88ā€‰Ā±ā€‰5.17

65.57ā€‰Ā±ā€‰4.96b

85.02ā€‰Ā±ā€‰41.19b

6.72ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.20b

(54.60ā€“58.72)

(65.76ā€“70.52)

(86.68ā€“119.94)

(6.73ā€“9.30)

(53.95ā€“58.72)

(62.72ā€“66.42)

(69.64ā€“100.40)

(5.53ā€“7.92)

DS-HA*

57.21ā€‰Ā±ā€‰4.93

67.79ā€‰Ā±ā€‰5.83

113.00ā€‰Ā±ā€‰41.08

8.82ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.15

56.51ā€‰Ā±ā€‰5.97

65.47ā€‰Ā±ā€‰6.08

105.81ā€‰Ā±ā€‰44.23a

8.30ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.55a

(55.37ā€“59.05)

(65.61ā€“69.96)

(97.66ā€“128.34)

(7.65ā€“9.99)

(54.27ā€“58.74)

(63.20ā€“67.74)

(89.30ā€“122.33)

(6.98ā€“9.63)

DS**

56.45ā€‰Ā±ā€‰5.99

68.30ā€‰Ā±ā€‰7.64

99.25ā€‰Ā±ā€‰31.14

7.83ā€‰Ā±ā€‰2.48

56.68ā€‰Ā±ā€‰6.45

66.53ā€‰Ā±ā€‰7.56

104.10ā€‰Ā±ā€‰48.75

8.27ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.81

(54.90ā€“58.00)

(66.33ā€“70.27)

(91.21ā€“107.29)

(7.19ā€“8.48)

(55.02ā€“58.35)

(64.58ā€“ 68.49)

(91.51ā€“116.70)

(7.25ā€“9.25)

DS-HA**

56.58ā€‰Ā±ā€‰6.01

68.10ā€‰Ā±ā€‰7.94

103.18ā€‰Ā±ā€‰40.55

8.13ā€‰Ā±ā€‰3.25

56.50ā€‰Ā±ā€‰6.45

66.45ā€‰Ā±ā€‰7.92

109.50ā€‰Ā±ā€‰63.47

8.63ā€‰Ā±ā€‰4.97

(55.03ā€“58.14)

(66.05ā€“70.15)

(92.71ā€“113.66)

(7.29ā€“8.97)

(54.83ā€“58.17)

(64.40ā€“68.50)

(93.10ā€“125.90)

(7.35ā€“9.92)

  1. DS double-leg semisquat exercise, DS-HA double-leg semisquat exercise with hip adduction
  2. 95Ā % CI 95Ā % confidence intervals
  3. *PFPS subjects **healthy subjects
  4. aElectric activity of the VMO muscles was significantly greater during DS-HA exercise than during DS exercise (Pā€‰<ā€‰0.05)
  5. bElectric activity of the VL muscle was significantly greater than that of the VMO muscle during DS exercise (Pā€‰<ā€‰0.05)