Skip to main content

Table 3 Main results of the included systematic reviews and meta-analyses stratified by the exposure factors

From: Association between work-related biomechanical risk factors and the occurrence of carpal tunnel syndrome: an overview of systematic reviews and a meta-analysis of current research

Author, year, ↓quality

Vibration (95 % CI)

Repetition (95 % CI)

Force (95 % CI)

Combined exposure (repetition and force) (95 % CI)

Wrist posture (95 % CI)

Computer exposure (95 % CI)

Barcenilla et al. 2012 [41] Grade B

NIOSH CTS def.: OR 2.7 (1.9–3.9); n = 12 studies Conservative CTS def.a: OR 5.4 (3.1–9.3); n = 3/3 (100 %) studiesd

NIOSH CTS def.: OR 2.3 (1.8–3.0); n = 25 studies Conservative CTS def.a: OR 2.3 (1.7–2.9); n = 5/11 (45 %) studiesd

NIOSH CTS def.: OR 2.2 (1.5–3.3); n = 13 studies Conservative CTS def.a: OR 4.2 (1.5–11.7); n = 3/5 (60 %) studiesd

NIOSH CTS def.: OR 2.0 (1.4–2.9); n = 4/9 (44 %) studiesd Conservative CTS def.a: OR 1.9 (1.0–3.5); n = 5 studies

NIOSH CTS def.: OR 2.7 (1.3–5.5); n = 7 studies Conservative CTS def.a: OR 4.7 (0.4–53.3); n = 1/3 (33 %) studiesd

/

Mediouni et al. 2014 [42] Grade B

/

/

/

/

/

Computer use: OR 1.7 (0.8-3.6); n = 5 studies; Keyboard/mouse use: OR 1.1 (0.6–2.0); OR 1.9 (0.9–4.2)

Van Rijn et al. 2009 [35] Grade B

OR 2.5–4.8; n = 3/5 (60 %) studiesd

OR 0.5–9.4; n = 5/8 (62 %) studiesd

OR 2.1–9.0; n = 3/7 (43 %) studiesd

OR 3.2–8.4; n = 3/4 (80 %) studiesd

OR 1.3–8.7; n = 4/5 (80 %) studiesd

OR 2.1–4.4; n = 2/7 (29 %) studiesd

You et al. 2014 [43] Grade C

/

/

/

/

Non-neutral wrist postures: RR 2.0 (1.7–2.4); n = 4/8 (50 %) studiesd

/

Spahn et al. 2012 [31] Grade C

OR 2.6 (1.7–4.0); n = 6/9 (67 %) studiesd

OR 2.7 (1.8–3.9); n = 11/13 (85 %) studiesd OR 2.1 (0.4–11.8); n = 3 cohort studies

OR 4.4 (1.4–13.6); n = 4/4 (100 %) studiesd

OR 8.4 (7.8–8.9)b; n = 2/2 (100 %) studiesd OR 1.8 (1.4–2.2)b; n = 2/3 (67 %) cohort studiesd

Flexion: OR 1.7 (1.0–2.6); n = 2/5 (40 %) studiesd

Computer use: OR 1.8 (0.8–4.1); n = n/a studies

Sulsky et al. 2005 [44]c Grade C

Insufficient evidence; n = 1 study

Consistent small positive association; n = 6 studies

Weak positive association of questionable validity; n = 3 studies

/

Insufficient evidence; n = 1 study

Insufficient evidence; n = 2 studies

Thomsen et al. 2008 [45] Grade C

/

/

/

/

/

Inconsistent evidence: OR < 1; n = 1 studies; OR > 1; n = 3 studies and n = 4 studies with no effect calculation or n.s.

Palmer et al. 2007 [22] Grade C

≥2 OR elevated risk (e.g., exposure ≥8 years); n = 7 studies

≥2 OR elevated risk (e.g., exposure <10 s. cycle time); n = 5 studies

Elevated risk for high-force jobs and activities (e.g., exposure >4 kg); n = n/a studies

Elevated risk for jobs with combined exposure; n = 1 study

≥2 OR elevated risk (e.g., exposure >17 or 20 h/week); n = 4 studies

Inconsistent results; n = 4 studies

Abbas et al. 1998 [21] Grade D

/

Significant predictor

Significant predictor

/

/

/

Lozano-Calderón et al. 2008 [46] Grade D

Ø OR 5.5; qBHs 6.3/21 points (range 5–8); n = 14/20 (70 %) studiesd

Ø OR 4.0; qBHs 6.5/21 points (range 5–10); n = 30/45 (67 %) studiesd

Ø OR n/a; qBHs 4.5/21 points (range 3–6); n = 15/31 (48 %) studiesd

/

Flexion: Ø OR n/a; qBHs 5.4/21 points (range 4–8); n = 7/17 (41 %) studiesd Extension: Ø OR n/a; qBHs 3.6/21 points (range 3–4); n = 3/7 (43 %) studiesd

/

  1. Abbreviations: CI Confidence interval, CTS Carpal tunnel syndrome, NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety (USA), n.s. not significant, OR Odds ratio, RR Relative risk, qBHs Quantitative score based on Bradford-Hill criteria (max. 21 points)
  2. aConservative CTS case definition: abnormal nerve conduction findings and symptoms (e. g., paraesthesia, pain, numbness) or clinical signs (positive Phalen’s sign or Tinel’s sign)
  3. bResults refer to American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienist (ACGIH) Threshold Limit Value (TLV) for Hand-Activity Level (HAL)
  4. cResults refer to eleven studies of high quality with minimised risk of bias
  5. dPositive correlation observed