Skip to main content

Table 6 Weighted proportions in per cent (%) of different implications of pain in the three pain categories based spreading of pain on the body. Statistical comparisons are furthest to the righta

From: Comorbidities, intensity, frequency and duration of pain, daily functioning and health care seeking in local, regional, and widespread pain—a descriptive population-based survey (SwePain)

Pain category Variables

Local pain (n = 400–417)

Regional pain (n = 2261–2205)

Widespread pain (n = 242–245)

Statistics (p-value)

Maximally 1 h weekly spent on demanding physical activities (%)

36.4

42.3

46.5

LP vs. RP: 0.025

LP vs. WSP: 0.001*

RP vs. WSP: 0.321

Impact on ability to work or to perform daily chores (%)

12.6

19.0

74.6

LP vs. RP: 0.002*

LP vs. WSP: <0.001*

RP vs. WSP: <0.001*

Complementary health care last 12 months (%)

19.5

19.4

21.7

LP vs. RP: 0.980

LP vs. WSP: 0.500

RP vs. WSP: 0.390

Health care previous 12 months (%)

37.1

40.5

81.5

LP vs. RP: 0.260

LP vs. WSP: <0.001*

RP vs. WSP: <0.001*

Hospitality and treatment from health care service (%)

8 (0–10)

7 (0–10)

6 (0–10)

LP vs. RP: 0.018

LP vs. WSP: <0.001*

RP vs. WSP: 0.028

  1. Range of response rate (n) across the variables is in the pain category column
  2. LP local pain, RP regional pain, WSP widespread pain
  3. *Denotes statistical group difference
  4. aDifferences in proportions are tested pair-wise