Skip to main content

Table 2 Baseline characteristics of the patients

From: Functional outcome and cost-effectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of acute scaphoid fractures: a cost-utility analysis

Variable

Group A (Active PEMF)

Group B (Placebo)

Number

51

51

Age – year*

35 (18 - 70)

34 (18 - 77)

Days between fracture and start of treatment*

4.25 (0 - 5)

3.69 (0 - 5)

Male (n, %)

40 (78)

38 (75)

Fracture in dominant hand (n,%)

28 (55)

29 (57)

Anatomical snuff box tenderness (n, %)

46 (90)

49 (96)

Pain with longitudinal compression (n, %)

39 (77)

45 (88)

Fracture type [17] (n, %)

  

- Tubercle (A1)

9 (18)

9 (18)

- Transverse waist, undisplaced (A2)

19 (37)

20 (39)

- Oblique (B1)

15 (29)

18 (35)

- Transverse waist with distraction (B2)

8 (16)

4 (8)

Comorbidities (n, %)

  

- None

34 (67)

38 (75)

- Osteoporosis

0 (0)

0 (0)

- Corticosteroids

0 (0)

1 (2)

- Multiple

1 (2)

1 (2)

Smoking (n, %)

16 (31)

11 (22)

  1. *Variables are denoted as mean (range).
  2. No significant differences were seen between groups.