Publication | Operation | Primary focus of intervention | Follow up interval |
---|---|---|---|
Location | Indication | Study setting | Outcomes |
Date of study | Number randomised (intervention:control) | Intervention, health professional. Time commenced | Adherence to intervention |
Mean age (% female) | Timing, duration and intensity | Losses to follow up (intervention: control) | |
 | Control group care |  | |
Bruun-Olsen et al. 2013 [29] Norway 2008-2010 | Primary TKA | Walking skills | On completion of intervention and 9Â months after intervention |
Osteoarthritis | Outpatient physiotherapy department | KOOS, 6Â minute walk test, performance tests, ROM, self-efficacy in activities | |
N = 57 (29:28) | Physiotherapist-led walking-skills programme with emphasis on weight-bearing exercises. Commenced 6 weeks after surgery | 28/29 completed programme (97%) 6 (2:4) not followed up | |
69 (56.1%) | 6–8 weeks |  | |
 | Usual physiotherapy |  | |
Evgeniadis et al. 2008 [19] Greece 2006 | Primary TKA | Strengthening | 6, 10 and 14Â weeks after surgery |
Osteoarthritis | Home | SF-36, Iowa Level of Assistance Scale, active ROM | |
N = 48 (24:24) | Supervised exercise programme with emphasis on strengthening lower extremities | 20/24 completed programme (83%) | |
69 (56.3%) | Commenced after hospital discharge | 13 (9:4) not followed up | |
 | 8 weeks |  | |
 | Control received standard preoperative and postoperative care |  | |
Frost et al. 2002 [17] UK 1995-1996 | Primary unilateral TKA | Functional exercise | 3, 6 and 12Â months |
Osteoarthritis | Home | VAS pain, ROM, leg extensor power, walking speed, gait speed | |
N = 47 (23:24) | Warm up exercise, chair rise, walking, and leg lifts. Commenced after hospital discharge | 16/23 completed programme (70%) | |
71.3 (48.9%) | Number of visits and duration not specified | 20 (7:13) not followed up | |
 | Controls given instructions to continue exercises taught in hospital |  | |
Fung et al. 2012 [27] Canada 2009-2010 | TKA | Balance and posture control additional to outpatient physiotherapy | Discharge from physiotherapy, estimate about 3Â months |
Not specified | Outpatient department in rehabilitation hospital | ROM, 2-minute walk test, NRS pain, LEFS, Activity-specific Balance Confidence Scale, length of rehabilitation, satisfaction | |
N = 50 (27:23) | Wii Fit gaming activities focused on multidirectional balance, and static and dynamic postural control | 27/27 completed programme (100%) | |
68.1 (66%) | Commenced a mean of 38–47 days after surgery | 0 lost to follow up | |
 | Twice weekly for mean of about 8 weeks |  | |
 | All patients received twice-weekly outpatient physiotherapy. Control patients also received 15 minutes of lower extremity strengthening and balance training exercises |  | |
Harmer et al. 2009 [30] Australia 2005-2006 | Primary TKA | Hydrotherapy compared with gym-based therapy | 8 and 26Â weeks |
Not specified | Community pool | WOMAC, VAS, 6Â minute walk test, stair ascent, ROM, knee oedema | |
N = 102 (53:49) | Supervised classes in pool with walking forward and backward, stepping sideways, step-ups, jogging, jumping, kicking, knee ROM exercises, lunges, and combined squats and upper extremity exercises. | 81% of patients attended at least 8/12 sessions 3 (2:1) lost to 26 week follow up | |
68.3 (57%) | Commenced 2Â weeks after surgery | Â | |
 | Twice a week, 60 min duration for 6 weeks |  | |
 | Control patients received gym-based rehabilitation with ergometer cycling; walking on a treadmill; stair climbing; standing isometric, balance and knee ROM exercises at a bar; and sit to stand exercises |  | |
Kauppila et al. 2010 [13] Finland 2002-2005 | Primary unilateral TKA | Multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme | 2Â months, 6Â months, 12Â months |
Osteoarthritis | University hospital outpatient department | WOMAC, 15Â min walk test, stair ascent/ descent test, isometric strength, ROM | |
N = 86 (44:42) | Week 1: physiotherapist assessment; 3 group sessions (45 minutes) with lower limb strengthening exercises; 2 pool gymnastic sessions (30 minutes) with lower limb stretching and mobility, and functional exercises focused on walking; lectures by social worker (60 minutes) and nutritionist (90 minutes) | 44/44 attended multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme (100%) | |
70.6 (75.6%) | Week 2: 2 lower limb strengthening exercise group sessions (45Â minutes); 3 pool gymnastic sessions (45Â minutes); orthopaedic surgeon lecture (45Â minutes) and clinical assessment (15Â minutes). | 11 (8:3) lost to 6 and 12Â month follow up | |
Included 60–80 years | Daily supervised group stretching exercises (30 minutes) |  | |
 | Twice weekly supervised group Nordic walking (30 minutes) |  | |
 | 4 group rehearsals of relaxation strategies (30 minutes) |  | |
 | Individualised exercise recommendations (40 minutes). |  | |
 | 2 group sessions on coping strategies (90 minutes) and individual visit with psychologist |  | |
 | Total 10 days at 2–4 months after surgery |  | |
 | Control received an exercise programme to complete at home from 2 months after surgery. |  | |
Kramer et al. 2003 [25] Canada Not specified | Primary unilateral TKA | Basic and advanced ROM and strengthening exercises. | 12, 26 and 52Â weeks |
Osteoarthritis | Home- and clinic- based groups | WOMAC, SF-36, KSS, stair ascent and descent, 6Â minute walk test | |
N = 160 (80:80) | Attended outpatient physical therapy. Therapists able to modify or add exercises, use therapeutic modalities, joint mobilisations or other measures as appropriate | 154/160 complete programmes (96%) | |
68.4 (56.9%) | Between 2 to 12Â weeks after surgery, two sessions per week for 1Â hour per session | 26 (11:15) medical issues, withdrawn consent | |
 | Home-base group received a telephone call once in week 2 to 6 and once in weeks 7–12 reminding them of the importance of exercise and to give advice |  | |
Liebs et al. 2010 [28] Germany 2005-2006 | Primary unilateral TKA | Ergometer cycling (additional to standard programme) | 3, 6, 12 and 24Â months |
Osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis | Multiple hospitals | WOMAC, SF-36 PCS, patient satisfaction | |
N = 159 (85:74) | Cycling with minimal resistance under guidance of a physical therapist. Aim was to improve muscle coordination, proprioception and ROM. | No information on patient adherence reported | |
69.8 (71.7%) | Three times a week for at least three weeks, starting after the second postoperative week | 24 (10:14) lost to follow up at 3Â months | |
 | Controls received standard physiotherapy programme only |  | |
Madsen et al. 2013 [24] Denmark 2010-2011 | Fast-track primary TKA | Group-based programme compared with home-based programme | 3 and 6Â months |
Osteoarthritis | Physiotherapist led strength endurance training, education, patient discussion. Home exercises twice weekly with strength training, endurance training on exercise bike, walking, balance, training and muscle strength training. | OKS, SF-36 physical function, EQ-5D, ROM, peak Leg Extensor Power, balance test, 10Â m walk test, sit-to-stand tests, VAS pain during Leg Extensor Power test. | |
N = 80 (40:40) | 2 sessions per week for 6 weeks starting 4–8 weeks after surgery. Average 10.5 sessions (range 4–12) | Patients in group-based programme attended mean 10.5 sessions (range 4–12). Adherence to home-based programme not reported | |
66.6 (41%) | Home exercises with 1–2 planned visits by a local physiotherapist | 10 (4:8) lost to follow up | |
Minns Lowe et al. 2012 [20] UK 2006-2009 | Primary TKA | Home-based functional rehabilitation | 3, 6 and 12Â months |
Osteoarthritis | Home | OKS, KOOS, leg extensor power, timed sit to stand test, 10 metre timed walk | |
N = 107 (56:51) received surgery | 2 physiotherapist home visits within 2 weeks and at 6–8 weeks after discharge. Assessment of function and rehabilitation progress on gait re-education, and use of walking aids. Twice daily exercise for 3 months: weight, partial knee bends/quarter squats, standing knee flexion and extension wall sits, heel and knee raises, step-overs, and stretches. Task training: getting in and out of a car, getting up from a chair at a table, walking outside and stairs. | 46/47 home-based group received 2 visits (98%) | |
69.2 (58%) | Controls received usual physiotherapy treatment provided at the hospital without additional home visits | 1 (1:0) lost to follow up | |
Mitchell et al. 2005 [21] UK 1999-2000 | Primary unilateral TKR | Home physiotherapy compared with outpatient group provision | 12Â weeks |
Osteoarthritis | Up to 6 post-discharge home visits by community physiotherapist. Commenced 3–19 days after discharge. Patient assessment and individualised therapy relating to pain relief, knee flexion and extension, gait re-education, home and functional adaptations, reduction of swelling and mobilisation of soft tissues. Before surgery patients received 3 visits. | WOMAC, SF-36, resource use and cost | |
N = 115 (57:58) | Controls received exercises and individual treatment 1–2 times a week | Home-based group had a mean of 8.4 sessions. Outpatient group had a mean of 3.5 sessions | |
70.3 (57.9%) | Â | 1 (0:1) lost to ITT analysis (45 patients withdrawn mainly pre-surgery) | |
Mockford et al. 2008 [14] Northern Ireland Not specified | Primary TKA | Outpatient physiotherapy | 3Â months and 1Â year |
Osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis | Outpatient department | Oxford Knee Score, SF-12, Bartlett Patella Score, ROM, Walking distance | |
N = 143 (71:72) | 6 weeks starting within 3 weeks of hospital discharge | Intervention group attended mean 7.3 sessions (range 0–9). 43/71 attended all sessions (61%) | |
70.2 (61.5%) | Control received no outpatient physiotherapy following discharge. All patients were given a home exercise regime to follow on discharge | 7(4:3) not followed up | |
Moffet et al. 2004 [18] Canada 1997-1999 | Primary TKA | Intensive functional rehabilitation | 4, 6, 12Â months |
Osteoarthritis | Rehabilitation Institute | WOMAC, SF-36, 6Â minute walk test | |
N = 77 (38:39) | 12 physiotherapist supervised sessions from 2 months after-discharge with individualised home exercises. 60-90mins per week for 6–8 weeks | All intervention patients participated in the 12 sessions | |
67.7 (59.7%) | Each session included: warm-up, specific strengthening exercises, functional task-oriented exercises, endurance exercises, and cool-down. ROM, pain and effusion monitored to optimise intervention. | 6 (0:6) not followed up at 12Â months | |
 | Control group received usual care including possibility of supervised rehabilitation at home |  | |
 | All patients were taught a home exercise programme before hospital discharge. |  | |
Monticone et al. 2013 [16] Italy 2010 | Primary TKR, osteoarthritis | Home-based functional exercise programme | 6 and 12Â months |
N = 110 (55:55) | Home | Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, NRS pain, SF-36 | |
67 (64%) | Continuation of functional exercises provided in hospital. Cognitive behavioural intervention with home exercise book about the fear-avoidance model and management of kinesiophobia. Monthly phone calls to reinforce adherence. | No patients dropped out of study but no information collected on patient adherence | |
 | Commenced after discharge from rehabilitation unit | 0 losses to follow up | |
 | Twice-weekly 60-minute sessions for 6 months |  | |
 | No physiotherapy. Advice to stay active |  | |
Piqueras et al. 2013 [22] Spain 2008-2010 | Primary TKR, able to walk and with no contra-indications for rehabilitation | Outpatient and home-based telerehabilitation | 2Â weeks after intervention and 3Â months |
Osteoarthritis | 5 sessions under therapist supervision at rehabilitation department and 5 sessions at home | ROM, isometric hamstring and quadriceps strength, pain, WOMAC, timed up and go test | |
N = 142 (72:70). 181 randomised but 142 completed baseline measures | Commenced after 2 week rehabilitation programme after hospital discharge | 18/72 home-based (25%) and 21/70 outpatient (30%) dropped out during first 5 sessions. | |
73.5 (72.4%) | Interactive virtual telerehabilitation. Patients received information needed to perform exercises and remote therapist monitoring. Therapy modified as rehabilitation evolved. System used wireless movement sensors, interactive software and a touch-screen computer, and a web-portal. | 9 (4:5) lost to follow up | |
 | Daily 1 hour sessions for 10 days |  | |
 | Conventional out-patient physical therapy. All randomised patients received a 2 week rehabilitation programme immediately after hospital discharge |  | |
Piva et al. 2010 [26] USA 2007-2008 | Unilateral TKR in the last 2-6months | Balance exercises (additional to supervised functional training programme) | 2Â months and 6Â months |
Not specified | Outpatient physical therapy department | WOMAC, Lower Extremity Functional Scale, timed chair rise test, self-selected gait speed over 4Â m | |
N = 43 (21:22) | Additional balance exercises (agility and perturbation) | 84% completed programmes. 64-67% of prescribed exercises completed | |
68.5 (71.4%) | Control group received a supervised functional training program without additional balance exercises | 8 (3:5) not followed up | |
 | Commenced 2–6 months after surgery |  | |
 | All patients received 12 sessions of functional training over 6 weeks |  | |
 | Home exercises given to both groups at the end of the supervised programme |  | |
Rajan et al. 2004 et al. [15] UK 1998-1999 | Primary TKA | Outpatient physiotherapy | 3Â months, 6Â months and 1Â year |
Monoarticular arthrosis | Outpatient | ROM | |
N = 120 (59:61) | Average 4–6 physiotherapy sessions | No information on patient adherence | |
68.5 (62.9%) | Commenced after discharge from hospital | 4 (3:1) not followed up | |
 | Control group did not receive outpatient physiotherapy |  | |
 | All patients given a home exercise regime on discharge |  | |
Tousignant et al. 2011 [23] Canada Not specified | TKA | Functional rehabilitation | 4Â months |
Not specified | Home | Knee range of motion, Berg balance scale, 30Â second chair-stand test, WOMAC, Timed up and go, Tinetti test, functional autonomy measu(SMAF), SF-36 | |
N = 48 (24:24) | Intervention group received tele-rehabilitation through high speed internet. Progressive exercises to reduce disability and improve function in ADL. Family member or friend present to ensure safety | No information on adherence | |
66 (unreported) | 2 sessions per week for 8Â weeks | 7 (3:4) not followed up | |
 | Commenced within 5 days of hospital discharge |  | |
 | Approx 1 hour duration |  | |
 | Control group received usual home care services and outpatient rehabilitation over 2 month period |  |