Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Agreement, reliability and validity in 3 shoulder questionnaires in patients with rotator cuff disease

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Sep 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Sep 2007 Author responded Author comments - Ole Marius Ekeberg
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Sep 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Oct 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Felix Angst
1 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Isam Atroshi
10 Dec 2007 Author responded Author comments - Ole Marius Ekeberg
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Dec 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Felix Angst
26 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Isam Atroshi
26 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Ole Marius Ekeberg
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
12 Apr 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Felix Angst
5 May 2008 Author responded Author comments - Ole Marius Ekeberg
Resubmission - Version 5
5 May 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
13 May 2008 Author responded Author comments - Ole Marius Ekeberg
Resubmission - Version 8
13 May 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 8
13 May 2008 Author responded Author comments - Ole Marius Ekeberg
Resubmission - Version 9
13 May 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
15 May 2008 Editorially accepted
15 May 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-9-68

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement