Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A comparison between one- and two-fluoroscopic techniques in percutaneous vertebroplasty

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Jan 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kerry Siminoski
6 Mar 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wilfred Peh
14 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Tsung-Jen Huang
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Tsung-Jen Huang
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
17 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Tsung-Jen Huang
Resubmission - Version 5
17 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
13 May 2008 Author responded Author comments - Tsung-Jen Huang
Resubmission - Version 6
13 May 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
13 May 2008 Editorially accepted
13 May 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-9-67

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement