Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The relative timing of VMO and VL in the aetiology of anterior knee pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Jul 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lee Herrington
16 Aug 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rudolf W. Poolman
3 Oct 2007 Author responded Author comments - Rachel Chester
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Oct 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Oct 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lee Herrington
31 Oct 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rudolf W. Poolman
30 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chris Sutton
30 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Rachel Chester
Resubmission - Version 3
30 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rudolf W. Poolman
18 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chris Sutton
3 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Rachel Chester
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Rachel Chester
Resubmission - Version 5
21 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
24 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Rachel Chester
Resubmission - Version 6
24 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
1 May 2008 Editorially accepted
1 May 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-9-64

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement