Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Effectiveness of accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation intervention compared to current intervention after hip and knee arthroplasty. A before-after trial of 247 patients with a 3-month follow-up

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Nov 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Markel
16 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Henrik Husted
28 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Liz Lingard
25 Feb 2008 Author responded Author comments - Kristian Larsen
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Feb 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Henrik Husted
17 Mar 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Liz Lingard
3 Apr 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Markel
7 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Kristian Larsen
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Kristian Larsen
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Apr 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Liz Lingard
26 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Kristian Larsen
Resubmission - Version 5
26 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
28 Apr 2008 Editorially accepted
28 Apr 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-9-59

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement