Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Minimum detectable and minimal clinically important changes for pain in patients with nonspecific neck pain

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Jun 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julie Fritz
22 Aug 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - soledad cepeda
3 Sep 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Henrica de Vet
7 Sep 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cecilie Roe
18 Oct 2007 Author responded Author comments - Francisco M. Kovacs
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Oct 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Henrica de Vet
3 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cecilie Roe
19 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julie Fritz
9 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Francisco M. Kovacs
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
18 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Henrica de Vet
18 Feb 2008 Author responded Author comments - Francisco M. Kovacs
Resubmission - Version 6
18 Feb 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
19 Feb 2008 Author responded Author comments - Francisco M. Kovacs
Resubmission - Version 10
19 Feb 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 10
25 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Henrica de Vet
5 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Francisco M. Kovacs
Resubmission - Version 11
5 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 11
Resubmission - Version 12
Submitted Manuscript version 12
11 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Francisco M. Kovacs
Resubmission - Version 13
11 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 13
Resubmission - Version 14
Submitted Manuscript version 14
Resubmission - Version 15
Submitted Manuscript version 15
1 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Francisco M. Kovacs
Resubmission - Version 16
1 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 16
3 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Francisco M. Kovacs
Resubmission - Version 17
3 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 17
Publishing
10 Apr 2008 Editorially accepted
10 Apr 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-9-43

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement