Long-term retention on treatment with lumiracoxib 100 mg once or twice daily compared with celecoxib 200 mg once daily: A randomised controlled trial in patients with osteoarthritis
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Oct 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Oct 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Roy Fleischmann|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Oct 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Nov 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Moore|
|10 Nov 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Day|
|15 Nov 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Scott|
|11 Jan 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Roy Fleischmann|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Jan 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andrew Moore|
|28 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Day|
|28 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Scott|
|5 Mar 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Roy Fleischmann|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|5 Mar 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|7 Mar 2008||Editorially accepted|
|7 Mar 2008||Article published||10.1186/1471-2474-9-32|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.