Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Long-term retention on treatment with lumiracoxib 100 mg once or twice daily compared with celecoxib 200 mg once daily: A randomised controlled trial in patients with osteoarthritis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Oct 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Oct 2007 Author responded Author comments - Roy Fleischmann
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Oct 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Moore
10 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Day
15 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Scott
11 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Roy Fleischmann
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Moore
28 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Day
28 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Scott
5 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Roy Fleischmann
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
7 Mar 2008 Editorially accepted
7 Mar 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-9-32

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement