Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the MTM-classification for proximal humeral fractures: A prospective study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Jul 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Gallo
11 Sep 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Ring
7 Oct 2007 Author responded Author comments - Christian Bahrs
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Oct 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Ring
12 Nov 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Gallo
4 Dec 2007 Author responded Author comments - Christian Bahrs
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Dec 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
20 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Ring
4 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Gallo
25 Jan 2008 Author responded Author comments - Christian Bahrs
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Jan 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Feb 2008 Author responded Author comments - Christian Bahrs
Resubmission - Version 5
5 Feb 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
17 Feb 2008 Editorially accepted
17 Feb 2008 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-9-21

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement