Table 3 Changes in mean bone mineral density in percent, compared with the first postoperative values
From: Maintenance of bone mineral density after implantation of a femoral neck hip prosthesis
Author | FU listed | subgroup | ROI 1 | ROI 2 | ROI 3 | ROI 4 | ROI 5 | ROI 6 | ROI 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
this study | 12 months | Cut | -0.8 | 1.6 | 2.8 | -0.4 | -0.8 | -0.7 | 0.7 |
Yamaguchi et al. | 12 months | fully coated | -18.1 | -12.1 | -7.8 | -8.9 | -8.3 | -14.5 | -21.7 |
| Â | 12 months | proximal coated | -12.3 | -8.0 | 0.3 | -3.1 | -1.5 | -5.3 | -17.6 |
Aldinger et al. | 12 months | male | -15.5 | -10.7 | -7.6 | -6.9 | -6.1 | -11.5 | -25.0 |
| Â | 12 months | female | -12.0 | -2.5 | -1.9 | -4.7 | -3.5 | -6.4 | -18.8 |
Venesmaa et al. | 12 months | anatomic | -10.6 | -6.7 | -2.0 | -4.4 | -2.2 | -9.3 | -22.1 |
Leichtle et al. | 6 months | custom stem | -14.9 | -13.3 | -11.1 | -10.7 | -10.8 | -12.8 | -23.7 |