Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The clinimetric qualities of patient-assessed instruments for measuring chronic ankle instability: A systematic review

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Aug 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Sep 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cornelia Van den Ende
14 Sep 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jay Hertel
13 Oct 2006 Author responded Author comments - christophe eechaute
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Oct 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Oct 2006 Author responded Author comments - christophe eechaute
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Oct 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Nov 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cornelia Van den Ende
6 Dec 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jay Hertel
6 Jan 2007 Author responded Author comments - christophe eechaute
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Jan 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
11 Jan 2007 Author responded Author comments - christophe eechaute
Resubmission - Version 5
11 Jan 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 5
11 Jan 2007 Author responded Author comments - christophe eechaute
Resubmission - Version 6
11 Jan 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
18 Jan 2007 Editorially accepted
18 Jan 2007 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-8-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement