Skip to main content

Table 6 Characteristics of included trials of pulsed electromagnetic fields for pain relief in patients with knee osteoarthritis

From: Short-term efficacy of physical interventions in osteoarthritic knee pain. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials

First author, publication year

Intervention type, treatment sessions and period

No of patients on active therapy (n = 255)

Method quality

Mean baseline pain (mm VAS)

Best mean difference (95% CI) of change over placebo (mm VAS)

Outcome assessment timepoints (weeks, best time point in bold)

Callaghan-05

SWT, 3 sessions/week, 6 sessions total, output 20 W in 20 minutes, 400 Hz, treatment dose 24 kJ

9

5

65.0

15.0 (-12.7 to 42.7)

2

Jacobson – 01

PEMF, 8 sessions, 1–8 Hz, 3 × 10-7G

101

3

63.3

7.9 (0.8 to 15.4)

2, 4

Nicolakis-02

PEMF 30 min daily, 6 weeks, 40 mT 1–3000 Hz

15

4

34.6

10.8 (-3.5 to 25.1)

6

Pipitone-01

PEMF 30 min daily, 6 weeks, 3–20 Hz, <0.5 Gauss

34

5

-

2.0 (-5.8 to 9.7)

6

Thamsborg-05

PEMF, 2 h daily for 6 weeks, 10 mV, 50 Hz

42

5

52.6

0.3 (-7.7 to 7.9)

2, 6, 12

Trock-93

PEMF, 15 Gauss, <30 Hz, 30 min 3–5 times/week, total 18 sessions

14

4

76.5

31.0 (11.0 to 51.0)

2,4, 8

Trock-94

PEMF, 15 Gauss, <30 Hz, 30 min 3–5 times/week, total 18 sessions

40

5

70.7

14.6 (0.9 to 28.3)

2, 4, 8

Best within 4 weeks

 

209

  

6.9† (2.2 to 11.6)

 

6 weeks

 

91

  

1.0 (-4.1 to 6.0)

 

8 weeks

 

47

  

19.8 (7.1 to 32.5)

 

12 weeks

 

42

  

-2.4 (-10.1 to 5.3)

 

Pooled 6–12 weeks

 

180

  

4.8 (-2.2 to 11.8)

 

Total

 

255

4.4*

63.7†

 

3.2*

  1. *Mean † Weighted mean