Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of a working population with shoulder disorders (n = 350), and univariable associations with sick leave (yes/no) during 6 months following first consultation in general practice

From: A prediction rule for shoulder pain related sick leave: a prospective cohort study

Variable

n (%)@

OR

95% CI

pa

Demographic

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

Age (years); mean (SD)

45 (11)

1.0

1.0, 1.0

0.26

Gender: male

193 (55)

0.9

0.5, 1.4

0.56

Education

Ā Ā Ā 

0.02

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒLow*

98 (28)

-

Ā Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒMiddle

148 (43)

0.5

0.3, 0.9

Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒHigh

99 (29)

0.4

0.2, 0.9

Ā 

Disease characteristics

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

Duration of complaints

Ā Ā Ā 

0.77

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒ0ā€“6 weeks*

139 (40)

-

Ā Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒ7ā€“12 weeks

77 (22)

1.1

0.6, 2.1

Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒ>3 months

134 (38)

0.9

0.5, 1.5

Ā 

Sick leave at baseline in preceding 2 months

Ā Ā Ā 

<0.001

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒ0 weeks*

254 (74)

-

Ā Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒā‰¤1 weeks

44 (13)

1.8

0.9, 3.9

Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒ>1 weeks

46 (13)

3.3

1.6, 6.9

Ā 

Gradual onset (vs. acute)

212 (61)

1.0

0.6, 1.6

0.89

Opinion regarding cause

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒUnexpected movement

16 (5)

1.7

0.5, 5.6

0.36

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒStrain/overuse: unusual activities

56 (16)

0.5

0.2, 1.1

0.08

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒStrain/overuse: regular activities

99 (28)

2.4

1.4, 4.1

<0.001

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒInjury

15 (4)

4..4

1.4, 15.3

0.01

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒSport injury

22 (6)

0.5

0.1, 1.7

0.26

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒUnknown

133 (38)

1.4

0.9, 2.4

0.17

Shoulder complaints in the past

199 (57)

1.4

0.8, 2.3

0.19

Neck complaints in the past

165 (48)

1.5

0.9, 2.4

0.11

Dominant side involved

210 (60)

1.5

0.9, 2.4

0.15

Co-existing psychological complaints

27 (8)

5.4

2.0, 13.9

<0.001

Additional musculoskeletal complaints

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒNeck/high back

119 (34)

1.6

1.0, 2.7

0.07

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒLow back pain

61 (17)

1.3

0.6, 2.4

0.50

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒUpper extremity

96 (27)

1.4

0.8, 2.5

0.21

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒLower extremity

77 (22)

0.7

0.4, 1.3

0.30

Shoulder pain (0ā€“10); mean (SD)

4.5 (2.3)

Ā Ā 

0.01

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒ0ā€“3 points*

Ā 

-

Ā Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒ4ā€“6 points

Ā 

2.4

1.3, 4.5

Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒ7ā€“10 points

Ā 

2.3

1.2, 4.5

Ā 

Shoulder disability (SDQ) (0ā€“100); mean (SD)

58.4 (24.0)

1.9

0.8, 4.8

0.24

Physical examination

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ROM shoulder (0ā€“18) (median, IQR)

3 (2ā€“5)

0.7#

0.3, 1.6

0.74

Pain shoulder with movement (<12, ā‰„ 12 points)

6.3 (4.0)

2.9#

1.3, 6.7

0.03

ROM neck (0ā€“4) (median, IQR)

0 (0ā€“1.5)

1.2#

0.7, 2.2

0.41

Pain neck with movement (0ā€“18) (median, IQR)

0 (0ā€“3)

1.1

1.0, 1.3

0.01

Physical factors

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

Physical work load (0ā€“5) (median, IQR)

1.6 (1.6)

1.3

1.1, 1.5

0.01

Repetitive movements (yes/no)

279 (80)

1.0

0.6, 1.9

0.97

Sitting in static position for long duration (yes/no)

138 (40)

1.2

0.7, 1.9

0.54

Physical activity in comparison to others

Ā Ā Ā 

0.09

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒmore active*

130 (37)

-

Ā Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒequally active

158 (45)

1.5

0.9, 2.7

Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒless active

60 (17)

2.2

1.1, 4.5

Ā 

Psychological factors

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

Coping; mean (SD)

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒCatastrophizing (1ā€“6)

2.2 (0.8)

1.6

1.1, 2.2

0.01

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒCoping with pain (1ā€“6)

2.9 (1.0)

2.6#

0.4, 17.9

0.44

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒInternal locus of control (1ā€“6)

3.4 (0.9)

1.5#

0.4, 5.5

0.76

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒExternal locus of control (1ā€“6)

3.1 (0.9)

1.9#

0.3, 14.2

0.76

4DSQ (median, IQR)

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒDistress (0ā€“32)

0 (0ā€“2)

4.4$

1.3, 15.5

0.01

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒDepression (0ā€“12)b

0 (0-0)

-

Ā Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒAnxiety (0ā€“24)b

0 (0-0)

-

Ā Ā 

ā€ƒā€ƒā€ƒSomatization (0ā€“32)

2 (0ā€“4)

3.0$

1.0, 9.1

0.05

Fear-avoidance (0ā€“24); mean (SD)

14.4 (5.0)

1.1

1.0, 1.1

0.04

Kinesiophobia (0ā€“12); mean (SD)

3.3 (3.4)

1.7#

0.5, 5.3

0.07

Psychosocial work environment

Ā Ā Ā Ā 

Quantitative job demands (5ā€“20); mean (SD)

12.8 (2.7)

1.4#

0.6, 3.0

0.68

Skill discretion (5ā€“20); mean (SD)

15.3 (2.8)

1.8&

0.6, 5.3

0.57

Decision authority (3ā€“12); mean (SD)

9.4 (1.8)

0.8

0.7, 0.9

<0.001

Co-worker support (4ā€“16); mean (SD)

12.3 (2.0)

10.1&

1.1, 92.4

0.07

Supervisor support (4ā€“16); mean (SD)

11.2 (2.5)

2.0&

0.9, 4.2

0.20

  1. SD = standard deviation; IQR = Inter quartile range; ROM = Range of Motion; 4DSQ = Four-dimensional symptom questionnaire. aVariables with a univariable p-value ā‰¤ 0.20 were selected for the multivariable analysis. bORs haven't been computed due to empty cells in the cross-tables. @or otherwise stated *Reference category. #In case of non-linear associations continuous variables were divided into categories. The table presents the Odds Ratio (OR) for the highest versus lowest category. &ORs were computed for lowest versus highest categories. $Variable was dichotomised. (lowest versus middle and high category).