Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Surgery is more cost-effective than splinting for carpal tunnel syndrome in the Netherlands: results of an economic evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Mar 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
31 Mar 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Werner
27 Apr 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vilh Finsen
5 May 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Hui
9 Jul 2006 Author responded Author comments - Maurits van Tulder
Resubmission - Version 2
9 Jul 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Aug 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Werner
27 Aug 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Vilh Finsen
24 Oct 2006 Author responded Author comments - Maurits van Tulder
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Oct 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Nov 2006 Author responded Author comments - Maurits van Tulder
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Nov 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
16 Nov 2006 Editorially accepted
16 Nov 2006 Article published 10.1186/1471-2474-7-86

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement